W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > May 2011

[Bug 12809] Invalid examples using link and meta elements in the body

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 14:24:22 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1QQguk-000659-QP@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12809

Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3cbug@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |Simetrical+w3cbug@gmail.com

--- Comment #1 from Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3cbug@gmail.com> 2011-05-29 14:24:22 UTC ---
This looks like an oversight in the spec splitting.  The intent is that
meta/link should be valid in this case, as in the WHATWG version:

http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/semantics.html#the-link-element
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/semantics.html#the-meta-element

But of course these lines aren't present in the W3C draft of HTML5.  So the W3C
version of microdata has to include some text saying that it makes meta and
link valid in the body if the itemprop attribute is present.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 29 May 2011 14:24:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 16:31:10 UTC