W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > May 2011

[Bug 12734] New: Clarify what types of changes can be made outside the decision process

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 07:41:21 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-12734-2486@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12734

           Summary: Clarify what types of changes can be made outside the
                    decision process
           Product: HTML WG
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: working group Decision Policy
        AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org
        ReportedBy: mjs@apple.com
         QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: mjs@apple.com, Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com,
                    rubys@intertwingly.net, mike@w3.org


Aryeh Gregor writes:

-----------
I notice that there's nothing specific about what changes the editor
is allowed to make, beyond "Although editors may field issues through
other forums if they wish, we will require editors to address all
bugzilla bugs."  Does this mean that there are no specific limitations
on what changes the editor can make, or just that this document
doesn't cover them?  In particular, I'd like to know whether the
editor will remain free to make substantive changes provided they
prove uncontroversial -- except if they would force us to return to
Working Draft, of course.  For example, adding a specification for a
previously-undocumented JavaScript property where no one but
implementers is likely to care about the details of how it's
specified.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 24 May 2011 07:41:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 16:31:10 UTC