[Bug 12609] Allow <ol>/<ul> to have <ol>/<ul> children

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12609

--- Comment #4 from Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3cbug@gmail.com> 2011-05-13 17:30:38 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I still have troubles to understand reasoning behing this change. What would be
> meaning of <ol> acting as an item of list?

As I said:

(In reply to comment #0)
> The items of the list should then be the li
> element children in tree order, except that if an li element is followed by a
> ul or ol element, that sibling should have the semantics of a list of sub-items
> (the same as if it were the last child of the li).

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Friday, 13 May 2011 17:30:40 UTC