- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 10:10:57 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12643 Summary: <video> change of fragment in media fragment URI consequences Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch ReportedBy: silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org, public-html@w3.org Over in bug 10723 we discussed about what should happen when browsers find a media fragment URI in the @src of a media element. We stumbled across the question of what browsers are supposed to do when the @src is changed by script, but only the fragment of the URL changes. Currently, it seems that even setting v.src=v.src triggers a full new run of the source selection algorithm and with it all the associated network activity and events. We've solved this problem for HTML pages and fragment addressing in http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/history.html#scroll-to-fragid But we haven't solved it for media resources (or image resources for that matter). What should v.src=s.src do? What should a change from http://example.com/video.ogv#t=20 to http://example.com/video.ogv#t=50 do? I think just like it is preferable for HTML resources to not retrieve the resource again, the same applies to media resources. v.src = v.src should probably just seek to the beginning of the resource, and a change of the fragment time should just do a change of the currentTime, too. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 10 May 2011 10:10:58 UTC