W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > May 2011

[Bug 12254] Investigate if <progress> element wouldn't need to be form-associated element

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Sat, 07 May 2011 18:54:40 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1QImeG-0003T3-78@jessica.w3.org>

Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |ian@hixie.ch

--- Comment #5 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2011-05-07 18:54:39 UTC ---
I just modeled <progress> and <meter> after <label>, which is form-associated
in the same (somewhat pointless) way. I can't really think of any reason that
labelable elements should be form-associated, so if nobody has a desire to keep
them form-associated (e.g. because it would make implementing it harder), I
would be fine with changing the 'labelable' category to be a separate concept
from 'form-associated'.

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 7 May 2011 18:54:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:49 UTC