W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > May 2011

[Bug 12337] "are to be" and "are not to be" should be "should be" and "should not be" respectively, for consistency with the following paragraphs.

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 21:55:34 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1QISzm-0002Eo-U7@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12337

Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX

--- Comment #1 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2011-05-06 21:55:34 UTC ---
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Rejected
Change Description: no spec change
Rationale: The "are to" bit is the non-normative description for authors. The
"should" bit is the normative requirement for implementors. The word "should"
has special meaning; search the introduction for "2119" for details.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 6 May 2011 21:55:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 16:31:09 UTC