- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 06:58:08 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12100 --- Comment #9 from Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> 2011-05-05 06:58:08 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > That's the kind of bug I think we should be trying to fix here. I'll be the > first to say it shouldn't be a high priority. What's the payoff from "fixing" it? > But it's the kind of thing that > can be fixed as people go through codebases, little fix here, little fix there, > until eventually it's all Unicode clean (except the DOM, which is a lost cause, > sadly). In Firefox, e.g. alert text is laid out and painted using the same machinery that is used for laying out and painting general DOM content, so that machinery has to deal with unpaired surrogates anyway without catching fire. How would the Web be better if window.alert() had extra code for doing something else with unpaired surrogates? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 5 May 2011 06:58:10 UTC