http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11828 --- Comment #24 from Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net> 2011-05-04 13:30:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #23) > (In reply to comment #22) > > I thought that responding in the bug thread is also supposed to be > > constructive, because not everyone is part of the WG. > > > > Perhaps you need another list: constructive actions, filtered by person. > > The filtering criteria was described here: > > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11828#c19 > > Additionally, if there is not a single WG member that supports a revert > request, the co-chairs are unlikely to give the request serious consideration. So what you're saying is there really is no consistent procedure in place. Good to know. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.Received on Wednesday, 4 May 2011 13:30:59 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 16:31:09 UTC