W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > May 2011

[Bug 11828] Drop hgroup completely until more research has been conducted

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 23:16:04 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1QHOp2-0007pS-TM@jessica.w3.org>

--- Comment #17 from Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net> 2011-05-03 23:16:03 UTC ---

(In reply to comment #16)
> When I opened this bug, I also submitted some research to bug 11731 and there
> was a discussion concerning hgroup and various alternatives on the mailing
> list. At that time nobody stepped into the discussion and said that opening a
> bug would violate protocol.
> When writing books about HTML5 authors should be aware that the spec is not
> stable and things might get moved around.
> I can't see the wisdom in keeping an idea that has flaws just because were too
> late into the process.

>From what I remember of the discussion on the procedures, bugs would be
automatically labeled LC comments.

But this item has an issue number, there has been various suggestions submitted
as replacement, a decision has not been made. More importantly, I believe this
issue is a LC issue item, which means, I thought, that this would be discussed
in Last Call. 

Does the HTML WG have a consistently procedure in place, or not?

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2011 23:16:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:48 UTC