W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > March 2011

[Bug 12401] "The noscript element must not be used in XML documents." "[...] it has no effect in the XHTML syntax." Why is this? Is this to intentionally confuse or restrict web developers into using a particular habit? There is no fathomable functionally practical r

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:58:21 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Q4wqj-0001Bl-Hw@jessica.w3.org>

Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |bzbarsky@mit.edu

--- Comment #1 from Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> 2011-03-30 14:58:21 UTC ---
It doesn't affect the syntax because XML parsers have no provision for randomly
ignoring tags completely inside some element, which is what <noscript> does in
HTML syntax.

So it's not a "decision" so much as a description of a fundamental limitation
of XML parsing.

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 30 March 2011 14:58:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:45 UTC