- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 23:00:31 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12374
Summary: "stylistically offset" means that this element has no
semantic value whatsoever? It is jsut for style
purpose? Then why not use a span? It seems strange to
me that there is no specific element to mark up
people. Even though there is a load of microdata av
Product: HTML WG
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the
-b-element
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson)
AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch
ReportedBy: contributor@whatwg.org
QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org,
public-html@w3.org
Specification:
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/text-level-semantics.html
Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the-b-element
Comment:
"stylistically offset" means that this element has no semantic value
whatsoever? It is jsut for style purpose? Then why not use a span? It seems
strange to me that there is no specific element to mark up people. Even though
there is a load of microdata available for them (relative, family, kin, met,
partner, spouse, etc) so why not use the b for people (but only if they need
to be marked up, e.g. to indicate relationship or in logs, etc.) It seems to
me the b has no other semantic use and all other uses mentioned here could
apply to span.
Posted from: 88.242.70.95
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:2.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 24 March 2011 23:00:33 UTC