- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 22:26:35 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12365 --- Comment #4 from Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> 2011-03-22 22:26:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > What's expected UA behavior for this? If UAs aren't supposed to do anything > with this, then @data-fullsize is the right solution. I don't know if you count it as 'do anything', but I'd say that @fullsize should have a DOMString attribute fullsize; > For linking thumbnail to full-size image, IMHO a much better (and hopefully > much more popular) design pattern is to use <a href=fullsize><img > src=thumbnail></a>. It has much better backwards compatibility and is still > easily usable by scripts. > > If explicit association of thumbnail and large image is needed, then perhaps <a > rel=fullsize> would be better? The idea of rel=fullsize sounds interesting to. The important issue, then, is to check whether such a thing is what authors ask for. It looks to me as if it isn't enough, given the common misuse of @longdesc for this purpose. (But the use of @longdesc might also be triggered by a desire to be 'valid' - HTML4 did not have a data-* attribute.) -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 22 March 2011 22:26:36 UTC