- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 17:58:24 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12334 Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-i | |ua.no --- Comment #1 from Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> 2011-03-18 17:58:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > I am then suggesting (a) to revert the semantics of <a> to the > html4 semantics: it's the source of an hyperlink and/or a named > anchor (b) to make <a name> valid again in html5. > I would not mind if a note is added asking web authors to prefer the > id attribute on an another element. ONE: I support the view that the definition of <a> is not optimal. If I remember correctly, it says that an <a> without @href, is "a place were there could have been a link if it had been relevant". TWO: But regardless of the definition: inside BlueGriffon, why don't you just convert <a name="*"> into <a id="*"> ? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 18 March 2011 17:58:26 UTC