- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 21:18:09 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12299 --- Comment #8 from Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> 2011-03-14 21:18:09 UTC --- Yep. I think it is fine to leave item() return null where [n] would be undefined because the property doesn't exist. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 14 March 2011 21:18:11 UTC