- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 20:45:28 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11637 --- Comment #8 from Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3cbug@gmail.com> 2011-03-09 20:45:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > The clearest case is when even the CP writer agrees that there are no > conformance changes. Whenever the CP writer puts "None" in the "Conformance > class changes" section, the Chairs should throw out the ISSUE, in my opinion. FWIW, I don't agree with this. In some cases, it's fair to debate editorial changes. To take a clear-cut case, if the editor were to insert an example or note that some working group members thought was severely misleading or incorrect, it would be fair to have a Change Proposal. I don't think we should have a blanket ban on editorial issues. I'm not really surprised by the chairs' decision. If it turns out to be a significant problem, though, we can always revisit it. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 9 March 2011 20:45:29 UTC