- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 08:38:52 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12267 --- Comment #6 from Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> 2011-03-09 08:38:51 UTC --- To give some background on the state of things, I argued for making abort, loadend and emptied async in <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7843>, and got my way. We absolutely do not want to go back to firing any events synchronously, but the model of the WebSockets spec where the state is also updated async is quite appealing to me. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 9 March 2011 08:38:54 UTC