- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 17:24:56 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11984 --- Comment #26 from Adrian Bateman [MSFT] <adrianba@microsoft.com> 2011-03-07 17:24:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #24) > A few of the things in > <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/NoVideoContentType#Negative_Effects> > are not solved by my new suggestion, so I'd consider not fixing these cons: > > * The incentive for supporting many different equivalent MIME types in > canPlayType and <source type> is removed, as they come only from legacy > Content-Type issues. > > * Some legacy MIME types, such as audio/x-pn-wav, can likely be removed from > implementations of canPlayType. > > This is damage we'll have to live with unless we always sniff, it might be OK > if implementors exercise some contraint in which MIME types they add support > for. WAVE might be a lost case, though. I didn't really understand these two points. I'm sure I'm just missing some background info. Please could you elaborate? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 7 March 2011 17:24:58 UTC