W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > March 2011

[Bug 11637] Disallow abusing the Decision Policy by escalating editorial bugs

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2011 02:06:00 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Pw3M8-0000hv-Qt@jessica.w3.org>

--- Comment #1 from Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3cbug@gmail.com> 2011-03-06 02:05:59 UTC ---
I suggest that this be accomplished by setting a slightly higher standard for
Change Proposals that don't make any conformance classes change.  For instance,
the chairs might require that such proposals clearly explain who will benefit
from the proposed change (specification readers? editors of other
specifications?), and at least briefly explain what specific benefit they'll
get.  This will at least help prevent Change Proposals like Julian's in
ISSUE-127, which don't even try to explain who will benefit or how.  If the
proposal suggests a conformance class change, that at least means we can figure
out who's affected, and presumably figure out how, so such an added requirement
isn't necessary.

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 6 March 2011 02:06:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:44 UTC