- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2011 02:06:00 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11637 --- Comment #1 from Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3cbug@gmail.com> 2011-03-06 02:05:59 UTC --- I suggest that this be accomplished by setting a slightly higher standard for Change Proposals that don't make any conformance classes change. For instance, the chairs might require that such proposals clearly explain who will benefit from the proposed change (specification readers? editors of other specifications?), and at least briefly explain what specific benefit they'll get. This will at least help prevent Change Proposals like Julian's in ISSUE-127, which don't even try to explain who will benefit or how. If the proposal suggests a conformance class change, that at least means we can figure out who's affected, and presumably figure out how, so such an added requirement isn't necessary. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 6 March 2011 02:06:02 UTC