- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2011 11:03:40 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12250 --- Comment #1 from Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> 2011-03-05 11:03:39 UTC --- See http://html5doctor.com/html5-simplequiz-6-zeldmans-fat-footer/ (please ignore the <figure> discussion for this bug) A few years ago, the content model of <footer> was changed specifically to allow usage of <footer> for "fat footers". However, some comments still don't choose <footer> based on their reading of the spec. Maybe the spec needs to make it clearer in the definition of <footer> that the element is appropriate for "fat footers". -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 5 March 2011 11:03:42 UTC