http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12250 --- Comment #1 from Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> 2011-03-05 11:03:39 UTC --- See http://html5doctor.com/html5-simplequiz-6-zeldmans-fat-footer/ (please ignore the <figure> discussion for this bug) A few years ago, the content model of <footer> was changed specifically to allow usage of <footer> for "fat footers". However, some comments still don't choose <footer> based on their reading of the spec. Maybe the spec needs to make it clearer in the definition of <footer> that the element is appropriate for "fat footers". -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.Received on Saturday, 5 March 2011 11:03:42 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 16:31:06 UTC