- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 19:22:49 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11956 --- Comment #7 from Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> 2011-03-04 19:22:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > hi leif, i am aware of bug 10919 it does not provide use cases for using > > presentation on form controls or links. > > There you mention two very specific elements. May be it can be justified that > those elements are excempted from the general permission to use > role=presention. In contrast, this bug report covers "all" elements. > > Btw, role=presentation is not the only thing that could make form controls and > links inaccessible to AT. Placing form controls or links inside elements with > role="img" would do the same. (Example: <div role=img ><a > href="*">link</a></div>) And, related, what about aria-labelledby or aria-describedby, if they are used to point to an anchor element or a form control element? Would that be any useful? Such an anchor element would appear completely dead - it would only be a presented to the AT user as pure text - click-ability would be gone. When is that useful? It seems that the real problem here is those specific, interarictive elements that you mention - in relation to *any* ARIA feature that in some way or another removes their interactivity. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 4 March 2011 19:22:52 UTC