- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 23:49:33 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11235 --- Comment #16 from Kyle Simpson <w3c@getify.myspamkiller.com> 2011-01-23 23:49:32 UTC --- I agree that more thought would need to go into all the possible resource requests which would benefit from this type of functionality. But it still seems like having `rel` as an attribute for all those different containers, with a value that said "suppress cookies", would be sufficient. If any of those containers don't yet support the `rel` attribute, it wouldn't seem too onerous to extend rel to those containers. Even if we're discussing sub-requests (like a script loads more scripts), those requests are always done via dynamically creating one of the containers in question, in which case setting the `rel` property should suffice, right? I think the only other concern would be if XHR requests should support a way to suppress in the same way, and I think that it should. I'm not sure `rel` for XHR would make much sense, but perhaps something like "sendCookies" or whatever. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 23 January 2011 23:49:34 UTC