- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 21:57:16 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8038 Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL|http://software.hixie.ch/ut |http://dev.w3.org/html5/spe |ilities/js/live-dom-viewer/ |c/syntax.html#void-elements |saved/288 | --- Comment #17 from Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> 2011-01-19 21:57:15 UTC --- Changed the URL field from the old URL (http://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/saved/288) to the specific section in the HTML5 draft which this blocks - the syntax description of void elements, http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/syntax.html#void-elements The contested spec text is these two sentences: FIRST: ]] Void elements only have a start tag; end tags must not be specified for void elements. [[ SECOND: ]] Void elements can't have any contents (since there's no end tag, no content can be put between the start tag and the end tag). [[ Suggested change to 'FIRST' sentence: The first sentence above must be changed to say that something like this: 'Void elements only have a start tag; but end tags can be specified provided that there is no content between the start tag and the end tag. Suggested change to 'SECOND' sentence: The sentences is correct, except for the "since there's noe end tag" string, which would could be rephrased into "since iti s a void element".) -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2011 21:57:19 UTC