- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:42:04 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8038
Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |TrackerRequest
--- Comment #15 from Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> 2011-01-19 15:42:03 UTC ---
I believe I have provided enough info for this bug. Hereby adding
TrackerRequest.
Suggested text for the issue tracker - borrowing a bit from Maciej's
formulations:
[[
It is hereby suggested
* to permit a close tag for new void elements
* to require that the close tag of such eleements would have to
immediately follow the open tag
meaning that a close tag separated by content would have to
be treated as just a stray close tag and a parse error.
Otherwise, if content were permitted and the HTML5-parsers were
required to look for the close tag that didn immediately follow,
then a an open tag alone wouldn't work , since the parser then
would have to parse to the end of the document
to know if there is a close tag.
This proposal is motivated by two factors: FIRSTLY, to be compatible with
HTML-parsers that haven't been updated to support a new void, element (and
thereby ease the introduction of new, void, elements) and SECONDLY, by a wish
to align the HTML syntax as much as possible with the XML syntax.
[[
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2011 15:42:05 UTC