- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 18:11:19 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11386 --- Comment #11 from Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> 2011-01-11 18:11:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > This should be defined in HTML, in the UA stylesheet. It's perfectly fine to > > have styles for <video> and <img> be different there. > > Precisely, this was my thinking too. So it's not out of scope for HTML, then? Ah, talking past each other. I meant that it was out-of-scope for HTML to define the rendering itself, since CSS can now handle it. It's perfectly appropriate (and necessary) for HTML to define *what* CSS is used to handle it. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 11 January 2011 18:11:23 UTC