[Bug 11694] "best representation" does not define how to normalize decimal part of second

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11694

Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |philipj@opera.com

--- Comment #1 from Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> 2011-01-07 19:33:16 UTC ---
For example, what is the "best representation" of these dates:

2010-01-01T01:02:03.0Z
2010-01-01T01:02:03.0100Z
2010-01-01T01:02:03.999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999Z
(something that can't be represented exactly be any integeger or float type)

?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Friday, 7 January 2011 19:33:18 UTC