- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 16:31:02 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11680
Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |philipj@opera.com
--- Comment #1 from Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> 2011-01-06 16:31:02 UTC ---
That's step 16.17. Presumably it should be "have a value". Also, shouldn't it
be the "best representation" of the modification time/current time, not just
any valid global date and time string? If not, why is the date from <time
pubdate> normalized in this way?
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 6 January 2011 16:31:04 UTC