- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 09:55:20 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11663 Summary: "non-shortest form" is more established than "overlong form" Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P2 Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch ReportedBy: hsivonen@iki.fi QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org, public-html@w3.org http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#overlong-form The spec talks about "overlong form". However, "non-shortest form" is more established Unicode jargon: http://www.google.com/search?q=UTF-8+overlong+form http://www.google.com/search?q=UTF-8+non-shortest+form It would make sense to use the term "non-shortest form" in the spec. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 4 January 2011 09:55:22 UTC