- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 09:55:20 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11663
Summary: "non-shortest form" is more established than "overlong
form"
Product: HTML WG
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: trivial
Priority: P2
Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson)
AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch
ReportedBy: hsivonen@iki.fi
QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org,
public-html@w3.org
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#overlong-form
The spec talks about "overlong form". However, "non-shortest form" is more
established Unicode jargon:
http://www.google.com/search?q=UTF-8+overlong+form
http://www.google.com/search?q=UTF-8+non-shortest+form
It would make sense to use the term "non-shortest form" in the spec.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 4 January 2011 09:55:22 UTC