- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 05:28:42 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11363 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |ian@hixie.ch Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2011-01-01 05:28:38 UTC --- EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Partially Accepted Change Description: see diff given below Rationale: The spec wasn't complete in its handling of transparent elements. I've tried to rewrite this part of the spec to make this clearer. I've also added more examples. Regarding the specific use case of <ruby>, the solution is simple: put the <ins> inside the <rt>. This is the same as when adding or removing an <li> (put the <ins> or <del> inside the <li>), which is an example in the spec. (As Mike mentions, <ruby> is additionally a bit more complicated due to the parsing implications.) -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 1 January 2011 05:28:44 UTC