- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:12:20 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11984 --- Comment #18 from Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> 2011-02-23 10:12:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #12) > > Since Microsoft and Mozilla do not implement the behavior resulting from this > > bug, and seem unwilling to do so, it may be a good idea to revert the change > > for now, pending further discussion. I say this even though Apple would > > somewhat prefer the behavior of ignoring Content-Type. Reopening bug based on > > new information from Mozilla and Microsoft reps. > > "may be a good idea" is kind of fuzzy. Can we please have an official statement > from the chairs? (asking because > <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11984#c16> indicates there's > still confusion) There is no confusion, just plain old disagreement. Normally when a bug report is filed and the editor agrees and fixes it, it is those who disagree that escalate the bug to an issue. I don't see why we should do anything differently here, especially given that no one is willing to implement the previous state either. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 23 February 2011 10:12:21 UTC