[Bug 12145] define how to resolve conflicting link types


Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |philipj@opera.com
         Resolution|                            |INVALID

--- Comment #1 from Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> 2011-02-21 09:43:58 UTC ---
Hmm, I wanted to write some examples here in response to
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Feb/0345.html>, but all I
could come up with in the existing list of keywords is:

<link rel="prev" href="foo.html">
<link rel="next" href="foo.html">

It turns out this isn't really a conflict, it would just result in a circular
reference of sorts, which is silly but not something implementations need to

<link rel="next" href="foo.html">
<link rel="next" href="bar.html">

This is not a conflict between the link types, but rather a question of which
document would be navigated to if one follows the "next" button in a browser.
That should be defined, but is unrelated to the problem I tried to formulate.

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Monday, 21 February 2011 09:44:00 UTC