- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 22:04:21 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12072 --- Comment #13 from Daniel.S <crazy-daniel@gmx.de> 2011-02-16 22:04:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > Following that logic, there is even less reason to make the XML declaration > non-conforming. (Bug 12073) Indeed. I don't see a reason to make it non-conforming at all. It's nothing more than yet another talisman like xmlns. Conformance checkers should probably inform about the talisman status though. > It will anyhow affect legacy browsers, including IE9. Let's face it: A lot of things defined by HTML5 affect any browsers from legacy to current generation. We're in the middle of defining the standard. You just have to break some things, else you'd either end up defining every quirk of every browser or forbidding every feature that has a buggy implementation in the wild. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 16 February 2011 22:04:22 UTC