- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:44:24 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11828 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |ian@hixie.ch Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2011-02-16 09:44:23 UTC --- EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: <hgroup> is in fact the result of awaiting patterns. The pattern is that people use <h1> and <h2> as heading and subheading respectively (without meaning heading and subsection). All <hgroup> does is wrap them up so they don't impact the outline algorithm. "Not really liked" isn't a technical argument, so that's not a reason to drop it. Having said that, I don't feel particularly strongly attached to having the <hgroup> element in the HTML5 spec. If you really want me to remove it, please reopen the bug and I'll take care of it. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 16 February 2011 09:44:25 UTC