- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 19:11:30 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11342 --- Comment #10 from Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com> 2011-02-14 19:11:30 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > I meant both for specs and implementations. It's more or less the same problem > either way. > Would two implementations fulfill requirements to have this added to the spec? It's a very simple issue in implementations, as the code is already available from textBaseline and/or fillText setters and methods. I don't see the difficulty in writing wording for this, for the spec. I'll write up patches and a spec wording submitted in the near future, and re-open this issue. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 14 February 2011 19:11:32 UTC