- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 00:29:10 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11298 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2011-02-09 00:29:09 UTC --- EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Partially Accepted Change Description: see diff given below Rationale: I've changed the parser to not do this stuff with surrogates (except for numeric char refs) — however, this is not because I think we should allow surrogates here, but because the DOM APIs shouldn't be letting surrogates into the platform, regardless of whether it's a parser API or some other API. That JS uses UTF-16 is a design mistake, but not one that we need to propagate to the entire platform, nor one that we need to enforce on other languages should they ever be added to the platform. As such, the DOM should be Unicode-clean, not UTF-16. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 9 February 2011 00:29:11 UTC