- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 21:23:48 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7601 --- Comment #10 from Daniel Weck <daniel.weck@gmail.com> 2011-02-02 21:23:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > Just wanted to clarify that I don't think this is a bad idea: I agree 100% with > what this link type is trying to accomplish. I just don't see it as having > fulfilled the requirements Ian set out for acceptance of the proposal, and, > given the way link type registration works, don't see the lack of inclusion in > the HTML5 spec as a blocker.(In reply to comment #9) > ... given the way link type registration works, don't see the lack of inclusion in > the HTML5 spec as a blocker. I'm not sure I understand the nature of the relationship between the HTML5 specification and the "rel extensions" wiki page, but I thought that this previously-closed issue was the right place to reactivate the discussion on the "pronunciation" rel extension. On a side note, if indeed this issue doesn't actually impact the HTML5 specification itself, I suggest closing this bug using "RESOLVED INVALID" instead of the previously-used "RESOLVED WONTFIX". -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 2 February 2011 21:23:53 UTC