W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > December 2011

[Bug 13657] exact number not imporant in range doesn't make sense.

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 21:45:01 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1RbfaP-000589-Qg@jessica.w3.org>

Cynthia Shelly <cyns@microsoft.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|NEEDSINFO                   |

--- Comment #3 from Cynthia Shelly <cyns@microsoft.com> 2011-12-16 21:45:00 UTC ---
So, I think that just removing the clause "but with the caveat that the exact
value is not important" would make it less confusing. 

consider the scenario where I have a slider with 50 at one end and 100 at the
other, and 4 tick marks in between, and step of 10.  In that case, the range
does represent a set of specific numbers.  This is a pretty common design
pattern for sliders on desktop apps.  The sentence above makes it sound like
Range is not the right control for this.  If range is not the right control for
this, what is?

Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 16 December 2011 21:45:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:02:10 UTC