[Bug 12984] Contributions to HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12984

steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #2 from steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> 2011-12-15 10:12:37 UTC ---
Hi Reinald, 

>Add:
>- They have problems to load images or the source of image is wrong

Words to this effect have been added.

>Question: In the *Example 2.5*, is it possible to use Image maps 
><map></map> to create alternatives and to put ALT inside of each <area> tag?

responded in a seperate bug
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12874

>Removing the link *Providing a text alternative that is not null. (e.g., 
>alt="spacer" or alt="image") for images that should be ignored by 
>assistive technology [WCAG20-TECHS]*. In that way, it would made users 
>confused about the meaning (if the user doesnt click on the link)


I have left the link in as I don't understand why its inclusion is confusing.
If you would like to explain further please reopen the bug.

>I belive that *3.11 A group of images that form a single larger picture 
>with and without links* is not necessary. the same situation is been 
>using at the examples *Example 1.1* and *Example 1.2*

responded in a seperate bug
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12877

>In the *Example 6.4*, I consider important a short description to the 
>image. It´s important even for a blind person or somebody who cannot 
>load images perceive that there is an image with a purpose: create a 
>medieval atmosphere to the webpage. I disagree that the image with 
>description is only related to the blind or low vision webpage. The link 
>example shows the users preference 
>http://webaim.org/projects/screenreadersurvey/#images

I have modified the spec text in Example 6.4
Please review
http://dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/Overview.html#sec6
I have not made it mandatory to provide an non null alt as there are some
circumstances where it is appropriate, but do encourage authors to provide a
text alternative.

EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: partially accepted
Change Description: spec modified
Rationale:see above.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Thursday, 15 December 2011 10:12:56 UTC