- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 05:56:47 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14109 --- Comment #7 from Michael Dale <mdale@wikimedia.org> 2011-12-10 05:56:43 UTC --- > Status: Rejected > Change Description: no spec change > Rationale: Let's leave this to the browsers for now and see if we need to give > the authors more control or if the browsers do a good enough job themselves. I don't see how the browsers can "do a good enough job" themselves the point is that authors need a standard way to control buffering progress like they can with existing flash based web video distribution platforms. Its not a question of whether browsers can "do a good job" its a question of tuning this to application / site specific context that are unknown to the browser. Its comparable to saying web authors don't need JavaScript control to be able to lazy load non-visible image assets, because ~browsers should handle that~. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 10 December 2011 05:56:49 UTC