- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 08:03:32 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14937
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com
--- Comment #3 from Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com> 2011-12-08 08:03:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> You obviously misunderstand, this issue has nothing to do with AT, your 'best
> practice' is based on a fiction that the title attribute content is available
> to all users via the browser, it is most evidently not.
It's based on potential future implementations not today's implementations.
An HTML WG decision discussed, and dismissed, the accessibility problems with
@title - taking the line that user agents could provide better access to @title
in the future:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Apr/0451.html
For now, the examples in the spec are in line with that decision.
Challenging the specification for @title should be a precursor for challenging
particular examples that use @title.
--
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 8 December 2011 08:03:34 UTC