- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 20:14:07 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11482 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|Awaiting implementation | |experience of existing | |accept="" feature | --- Comment #17 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2011-12-07 20:14:05 UTC --- Henri: Based on comment 11, I would be forced to conclude that providing a MIME type at all is a waste of time, and hat we should remove that feature and replace it with one that takes extensions, to see if that works instead. That seems highly unlikely to be the actual situation (I would guess that since operating systems these days actually have applications register MIME types and extensions alike, they would often both work, especially for more standard types like images), hence my desire to get more implementation experience. My guess is that data will show that both MIME types and extensions have their place, but both should be purely advisory, never _preventing_ users from uploading their files. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 7 December 2011 20:14:09 UTC