- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 16:32:30 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15007 --- Comment #28 from Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com> 2011-12-06 16:32:29 UTC --- While the missing close is indeed a bug, note how it spins until any previous invocations have completed, which I believe is all that the setImmediate spec requires (section 5 step 6). Order is not guaranteed. I believe the upthread implementation would fail that requirement actually, but can't be sure until I'm back at a computer. Whether the spec should include a new clause demanding ordering, or remove the clause requiring task invocations to complete before queueing a new one, is another question. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 6 December 2011 16:32:35 UTC