- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 19:27:16 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15041 --- Comment #5 from Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> 2011-12-02 19:27:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > But an image generated with 1 image pixel = 1 backing-store pixel will look > > double-size. > > > > So, we've gotta make some sacrifices somewhere. > > Right. So do you make things lossy but work for naive web developers, or > non-lossy but require a bit more web author smarts? We went the latter route > for getImageData(). Yes, and I think that was the right choice - when you're pulling out the image data explicitly, you generally actually want the real data. However, there's no way to express the dpi of an image in a way that a web browser will automatically pay attention to, unfortunately. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 2 December 2011 19:27:21 UTC