- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 19:18:24 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14363 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ribbens <jon-w3c@unequivocal.co.uk> 2011-12-02 19:18:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > Tools shouldn't be just scraping the sites automatically (and don't, in > practice). It's what they *must* do, according to the current HTML5 specification. > HTML will continue to evolve until it is dead. It's a living standard. > This is false. If I were to die suddenly, people would just lift up the spec > and wiki and put it elsewhere, assuming they couldn't get the site reassigned > to them, which would be the more likely situation. I'm sure this argument has been done to death elsewhere, but suffice to say that your usage of the word "standard" appears to me to be somewhat... non-standard. This state of affairs is rather alarming for such an important specification. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 2 December 2011 19:18:28 UTC