- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 17:05:03 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15007 --- Comment #13 from Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org> 2011-12-02 17:05:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > How is this not setTimeout(task, 0)? (We've had that discussion before, I'll postpone rehashing it in favor of seeing other people's thoughts.) (In reply to comment #11) > This isn't intended for driving animations. I can see a case for giving > background tabs lower priority, but I don't think they should stop completely > like requestAnimationFrame, or throttle to 1s like setTimeout. setTimeout throttles to 4ms, not one second, and only for nested timeouts (at least per spec). But that's all just a workaround for legacy code--code tested in browsers that had a 10ms minimum timeout. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 2 December 2011 17:05:09 UTC