W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > August 2011

[Bug 13424] [editing] Align the definitions of "editable" and "editing host" with the editing spec or move them entirely to the editing spec

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 23:43:43 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1QwjaJ-0003EF-JT@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13424

--- Comment #6 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2011-08-25 23:43:43 UTC ---
BTW, the editing APIs spec doesn't use the "formatBlock candidate" category,
which means that "formatBlock" doesn't handle the new elements. Instead it has
a hard-coded list called "formattable block name" that only includes the legacy
blocks. Is this intentional?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2011 23:43:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 16:31:17 UTC