- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 19:07:50 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13062 Marat Tanalin <mtanalin@yandex.ru> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #23 from Marat Tanalin <mtanalin@yandex.ru> 2011-08-24 19:07:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #22) > Since each case of this has case-specific considerations, please file a > separate bug for each instance of this pattern that you want changed. Bad thing is that separate bug-reports will not prevent making similar impractical spec-level mistakes again and again when inventing new structural markup for future HTML versions. For example, if even current "child"-bugs will be fixed, then potential new markup in future could contain same absurd requirement like "Element A should be first direct child of element B" again and again. This might lead to reporting more "case-specific" bugs while keeping actual fundamental issue still nonresolved. Purpose of the current bug-report is to prevent ALL such nonsensical requirements from appearing in the HTML spec forever. Any element that can be styled at all (unlike, for example, PARAM inside OBJECT) should never be limited to be first or last child of any element. Otherwise, it will be inevitably abandoned in real practice in favor of more flexible (while less semantical) elements. This would be very harmful for semantics and for HTML itself. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 24 August 2011 19:07:52 UTC