- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 23:17:46 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12687 --- Comment #14 from Stefan de Konink <stefan@konink.de> 2011-08-12 23:17:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) > Is there a testcase demonstrating the various behaviours here? Is there any > documentation on which sites this behaviour breaks? Which browsers had which > behaviour? I'd like to study this further. I can only comment on the fact that after our CMS broken on 'mandatory' Firefox upgrade, I went searching in the bugtracker of Mozilla and found a not of noise on the why this change was pushed trough. Historically I know that the behavior this change request would like to achieve was supported on Firefox < 4. And is still supported in Safari and Chrome. I am certain it never worked in Internet Explorer. I have no data on Opera. The rationale for us using the image submit (historically) was presenting the user with several graphical panes that could be choosen from, renderings of a screen. Analogue to a submit button having text. Now you could argue: "but why don't you use CSS to set a background image on a submit button". This was indeed the solution to get crossbrowser support. But reading the documentation on W3Schools: "image Defines an image as a submit button" My point being: functionality wise nothing is lost by moving to type=submit/background-image. But are we really going to define a standard that explicitly makes one exception on name/value passing? I'm not puting the more radical: "why not remove the 'img' tag, because you could use a div tag with background-image", argument here. Because it is clearly a no brainer the functionality is already in place, only an explicit exception is made. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 12 August 2011 23:17:51 UTC