W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > August 2011

[Bug 12781] Allow "maxlength" attribute for number fields

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 06:49:15 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1QrP4t-0006uK-UW@jessica.w3.org>

Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |

--- Comment #5 from Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org> 2011-08-11 06:49:15 UTC ---
<MikeSmith> Hixie: I don't understand http://html5.org/r/6413  
<MikeSmith> the spec already states that maxlength on input@type=number is not
<MikeSmith> so validator.nu currently emits an error for it  
<MikeSmith> this change would cause it to emit a warning in addition to an
<MikeSmith> unless I'm misunderstanding something  
<MikeSmith> but
lists maxlength under "The following content attributes must not be specified
and do not apply to the element"  
<MikeSmith> and
also indicates that maxlength is now allowed on input@type=number  
<MikeSmith> if the intent is to actually make it conforming but obsolete, it
seems like those parts of the spec should be changed as well  
<zcorpan> MikeSmith: "should not" means it's allowed if you have a good reason  
<MikeSmith> OK  
<MikeSmith> but if so, those two parts of the spec should be changed  
<zcorpan> yeah  
<MikeSmith> I don't see how otherwise we can make any changes to the validation

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 11 August 2011 06:49:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:02:00 UTC