W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > August 2011

[Bug 13480] Misuse of "child nodes" term

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 15:30:36 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1QpMM8-0001UL-Nm@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13480

Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED
            Summary|Add definition of "child    |Misuse of "child nodes"
                   |nodes" term                 |term

--- Comment #7 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2011-08-05 15:30:35 UTC ---
Wow, yeah, I have no idea what I was smoking when I wrote that. Fixed.

EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Accepted
Change Description: see diff given below
Rationale: see comment 5

I didn't add cross-references since the terms are used all over the place and
they're normal computer science terms used with their regular meaning.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 5 August 2011 15:30:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 16:31:16 UTC