W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > August 2011

[Bug 13531] use of implicit labels in examples

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 21:32:14 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1QoMZS-00011C-LV@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13531

Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jackalmage@gmail.com

--- Comment #1 from Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> 2011-08-02 21:32:14 UTC ---
I don't understand.  Yes, <label for> is useful for some structures that
implicit-<label> is not.  It doesn't follow that <label for> should thus be
preferred in all situations.  Implicit-<label> is useful and less verbose than
<label for> in the common cases that it's possible in.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 2 August 2011 21:32:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 16:31:15 UTC